Achaean News
RE: Time, Chaos and Change
Written by: Master Recah, Buhawi ng Dilim, Faithful One
Date: Tuesday, January 22nd, 2002
Addressed to: Xadzia Rihwin
I would like to make a few points about the arguments in the conjecture
you presented.
1. In a debate you do not assume that what you believe in is right. Or
more,
appropriately, do not use your beliefs as evidence of what you are
saying. Why?
Because the everything in your Sphere of Reality, which is not
necessarily the
same as the Sphere of Reality of the others. In a debate you present
facts,
those which are assumed to be true because the effects they entail are
present.
Facts like events which most have witnessed and testify to and Facts
which are
proven logically by previous facts. The purpose of debate is
enlightenment, and
if you specifically state regarding your arguments. Do not state your
beliefs
without solid, logical, reasonable, undoubtable proof.
2. Chaos is everpresent. Every process begets more Chaos. The more you
try to
put things in order, the more that chaos increases. I will prove this:
Something
changes, there is chaos. That is a fact. Chaos is change. But what about
if
something does not change. What about the "still moment in time you were
talking
about?" If that still moment in time, does come about... Nothing WILL
change.
Reality is based on what we perceive mostly. But will we perceive any
change at
all, if time stops? We will not. So to us, no time stop ever happened.
There is
no time stop if it's not in anyone's Reality. What if it WAS in
someone's
Reality? Then that being, Mortal, or Immortal was not affected by the
stop, He
perceived something. And in thus, his perceiveing the time stop, means
that
something changed. That Chaos was generated.
3. And lastly back to the question of debate. It is a very vague
question (or
questions to be exact) because on of its parts, (Do Gods change?) can be
easily
proved. It's almost assumed correct. When Gods change their feelings
towards one
another (which has happened all too often), it's already change in
themselves. I
thought of a more appropriate question, but I lost it in the rhetoric.
Well, I think that's all for now. I hope I haven't offended anyone, by
what I
just posted.
-Buhawi-
Penned by my hand on the 5th of Daedalan, in the year 297 AF.
RE: Time, Chaos and Change
Written by: Master Recah, Buhawi ng Dilim, Faithful One
Date: Tuesday, January 22nd, 2002
Addressed to: Xadzia Rihwin
I would like to make a few points about the arguments in the conjecture
you presented.
1. In a debate you do not assume that what you believe in is right. Or
more,
appropriately, do not use your beliefs as evidence of what you are
saying. Why?
Because the everything in your Sphere of Reality, which is not
necessarily the
same as the Sphere of Reality of the others. In a debate you present
facts,
those which are assumed to be true because the effects they entail are
present.
Facts like events which most have witnessed and testify to and Facts
which are
proven logically by previous facts. The purpose of debate is
enlightenment, and
if you specifically state regarding your arguments. Do not state your
beliefs
without solid, logical, reasonable, undoubtable proof.
2. Chaos is everpresent. Every process begets more Chaos. The more you
try to
put things in order, the more that chaos increases. I will prove this:
Something
changes, there is chaos. That is a fact. Chaos is change. But what about
if
something does not change. What about the "still moment in time you were
talking
about?" If that still moment in time, does come about... Nothing WILL
change.
Reality is based on what we perceive mostly. But will we perceive any
change at
all, if time stops? We will not. So to us, no time stop ever happened.
There is
no time stop if it's not in anyone's Reality. What if it WAS in
someone's
Reality? Then that being, Mortal, or Immortal was not affected by the
stop, He
perceived something. And in thus, his perceiveing the time stop, means
that
something changed. That Chaos was generated.
3. And lastly back to the question of debate. It is a very vague
question (or
questions to be exact) because on of its parts, (Do Gods change?) can be
easily
proved. It's almost assumed correct. When Gods change their feelings
towards one
another (which has happened all too often), it's already change in
themselves. I
thought of a more appropriate question, but I lost it in the rhetoric.
Well, I think that's all for now. I hope I haven't offended anyone, by
what I
just posted.
-Buhawi-
Penned by my hand on the 5th of Daedalan, in the year 297 AF.
