Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #9980

Oakstone `Law`

Written by: Agonotheta Caliga, Tear Lucoster, Vengeance-Seeker
Date: Monday, July 22nd, 2002
Addressed to: Conor


Greetings and welcome to a waste of my 1000 gold!
Hurrah for the selling of credits that makes this
possible!

Conor, correct me if I am wrong, okay? Don't blabber
at me about all the `technicalities` of my post.
Just, correct me if I'm wrong. In message, tell, or
if you're rich enough, another post.

The -only- offenses one can commit to become enemied
to the forests. Are as follows-
o Starting forest fires - which Serthest cannot do.
o Extermination - which Serthest cannot do.
o Overharvesting - which Serthest cannot do.

By your abuse of enemying Serthest for protecting
of the wormholes that he and his guild spent
their time on, you're not only abusing your power,
but making Oakstone in a grand general look very very
bad.

By your abuse of enemying Serthest for `breaking Oakstone
law`, in which he never did, he was simply protecting
what belonged to him and his own. Go ahead and tell me
that, `That's all I was doing too!` I'd -love- to hear
that -straight- from the mouth of one of Oakstone's most
verbal Hierophants.

As far as that list I mentioned earlier goes, I -still-
don't think Serthest can do any of them.. So from the
looks of things, you're just, trying to strut around
and are most definately making things look like Oakstone
wants -control- of the Darkenwood, instead of just
to do their `Divinely appointed duty to protect the
leafy green trees across Sapience`!

Again, correct me if I'm wrong.


Oh tra-la-la,
- Tear Lucoster

Penned by my hand on the 14th of Ero, in the year 311 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #9980

Oakstone `Law`

Written by: Agonotheta Caliga, Tear Lucoster, Vengeance-Seeker
Date: Monday, July 22nd, 2002
Addressed to: Conor


Greetings and welcome to a waste of my 1000 gold!
Hurrah for the selling of credits that makes this
possible!

Conor, correct me if I am wrong, okay? Don't blabber
at me about all the `technicalities` of my post.
Just, correct me if I'm wrong. In message, tell, or
if you're rich enough, another post.

The -only- offenses one can commit to become enemied
to the forests. Are as follows-
o Starting forest fires - which Serthest cannot do.
o Extermination - which Serthest cannot do.
o Overharvesting - which Serthest cannot do.

By your abuse of enemying Serthest for protecting
of the wormholes that he and his guild spent
their time on, you're not only abusing your power,
but making Oakstone in a grand general look very very
bad.

By your abuse of enemying Serthest for `breaking Oakstone
law`, in which he never did, he was simply protecting
what belonged to him and his own. Go ahead and tell me
that, `That's all I was doing too!` I'd -love- to hear
that -straight- from the mouth of one of Oakstone's most
verbal Hierophants.

As far as that list I mentioned earlier goes, I -still-
don't think Serthest can do any of them.. So from the
looks of things, you're just, trying to strut around
and are most definately making things look like Oakstone
wants -control- of the Darkenwood, instead of just
to do their `Divinely appointed duty to protect the
leafy green trees across Sapience`!

Again, correct me if I'm wrong.


Oh tra-la-la,
- Tear Lucoster

Penned by my hand on the 14th of Ero, in the year 311 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next