Hi all,

I just had to comment about that story.

The good man would have stopped and the evil man would have went on
their way. And the Chaotic man would have stopped and probably killed
him.

<just adlibbing>

Umm Why would you tag the evil man evil just because he didn't stop?
Maybe he saw something in the beggar no one else saw. Like the fact that
he was a contagious LEPER. And the 'Evil' man had a family at home that
he was the bread winner for. Maybe he went on his way and got someone
who was able to handle the beggar and his condition. I think if that man
had stopped and helped the beggar and the beggar infected him or jumped
up because he was pretending and killed the man would have been a much
more evil act.

Sometimes what you see on the surface isn't always the whole story.

The good man would have stopped and in doing so caught the disease and
taken it home to his village. The whole village would have come down
sick and leperous. This is good or evil?

The chaotic man would have stopped and killed the man? hmm Maybe he saw
that the man was indeed incurable and put him out of his misery with his
sword that he then burned with the corpse. Or maybe he did indeed leave
it on the doorstep of his enemy, condeming himself to death just for
revenge.

I think a person who strives to do 'good' wouldn't put themselves or
their loved ones in danger by their acts. What is that saying I just
made up?:

Those who do the ultimate evil are the same ones who try to do the
ultimate good.

M

Penned by my hand on the 8th of Daedalan, in the year 302 AF.