Taranis has declared some beings of Achaea under his protection.
Sinistar has declared some beings of Achaea under his protection.

Arguments over which are worthy of protection are those of morals
and ethics, and thus not commonly agreed upon. The claims, however,
are equivalent. Each may well be protection their friends.

To claim that one is valid, and the other invalid, would be to show
a certain lack of logical capability. Instead, one might claim that
they oppose the decision of another... Isildur may fight Sinistar for
having made a statement of protectorate over the Goblins... this is
not particularly different than any other reason that Sinistar and
Isildur would fight. They lead opposing sides.

Let us drop the charade and posturing, and realize the truth here.

Brother Thaulan, Devil's Advocate

Penned by my hand on the 6th of Valnuary, in the year 243 AF.