Your post seems nothing but one big defensive interpretation of what I
assumed to be a friendly conversation, until seeing this post after you
asked me to go post a response to it. Why you post to public in this way
and then ask me to go reply, instead of asking for any misunderstandings
to be cleared up in private, well I may never know or understand, I
never thought you seemed the type that enjoyed a public display, but
here we are.

On the topic of 'cyrene could be enemying for breaking the treaty' you
sound as though I threatened you when this is not even close to what I
said... after you asked me why I would think the treaty could bind you
when you are not a magi, I replied that in the future I wished to ask
the city to put a law in place in support of the guild, to ensure the
shopkeepers of the city don't dropkick the treaty in a city where a magi
guild resides. Those were my intentions, and I wish not to have the city
misrepresented.

On the topic of you removing the items from your shop, and your shop
becoming a thing of the past.... guilt trip much? I personally, out of
my pocket bought those items in question, never so much as requested a
refund for them, so I doubt it.

Two different answers from two different GM's, well not to imply that
Marec or whatever his name is gives bad information, because I seriously
doubt that is the case, but I never heard of him before, he seems to
have come out of nowhere, I've never seen him in Council of Magi(those
who handle the treaty issues) and he wasn't present at the meeting when
the four guildmasters agreed that 'used' items would not be underpriced.

The next time you want to put a guilt trip on all of sapience in the
name of slandering something, please direct your implications at the
person, rather than the organizations they are a part of.

Penned by my hand on the 2nd of Mayan, in the year 352 AF.