Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #11908

Lets straighten out some of your inaccuracies..again

Written by: Covenant Stormcrow
Date: Tuesday, December 2nd, 2003
Addressed to: Lord Kaelin Aristata


The proposal to ban the use of Extermination by
Mhaldorians, with penalties imposed by Mhaldor was..gasp..
done by Mhaldor, not long after its creation, and not
something the Forestals attempted to impose. We were
greatly pleased to hear it, and thought it might prove
to be an improvement on relations IF it was upheld.

Of course, it has proved to be merely lies, not just the
original agreement OFFERED by Mhaldor, but also the
subsequent peace agreement with the same basic terms
later agreed to.

We don't persecute the followers of Lord Sartan. Most
of us would just as soon never have anything to do with
those people, and tend to go out of our way to avoid
them on a daily basis. Certainly, many of us have
some dislike, but I would hardly call distaste and
staying out of Mhaldor persecution.

Repeated herb bans? Hmm...there have been 2 formal
Sentinel herb bans on Mhaldor..the first was rather short, and
started during that last time of conflict, and ended shortly
after it ended. The second started recently when you
decided to abrogate agreements your city made. As to its
ineffectiveness...it actually is totally effective.
The idea is not to stop you from having cures you need
should you ever be in combat. The principle is that WE
will not be the ones supplying you.

Attempts to govern the use of Necromancy? See the first part..
Mhaldor proposed it, not Oakstone. Of course, I personally
did not expect Mhaldor to be able to keep its word
regarding such a matter. And you have proven me right.

In response to your next post:

Rhakshai is not a man of reasonable intelligence. Just ask her.

The reason I procured the vardrax and the orders I gave
are not as you proclaimed. Indeed, the only actual order
given regarding placement of any vardrax traps was to place
them WITHIN forest, not highways. Of course, these traps
would be used against forest enemies, which means they
would not be doing any harm to the rational necromancers
out there.

The followers of Lord Sartan waged a war upon the forests.
The Red Fog destroyed many groves, and attempted to
spread throughout Sapience.
Mhaldor has twice broken its word regarding policies
on the use of Extermination, an idea first proposed
BY Mhaldor.

Which part of the reasoning behind my dislike do you find
irrational? I would not call it hatred..you cannot
hate a rabid dog, you just put it out of its misery
if you cannot stay away from it.

Or it away from you.

Covenant Stormcrow

Penned by my hand on the 4th of Glacian, in the year 350 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #11908

Lets straighten out some of your inaccuracies..again

Written by: Covenant Stormcrow
Date: Tuesday, December 2nd, 2003
Addressed to: Lord Kaelin Aristata


The proposal to ban the use of Extermination by
Mhaldorians, with penalties imposed by Mhaldor was..gasp..
done by Mhaldor, not long after its creation, and not
something the Forestals attempted to impose. We were
greatly pleased to hear it, and thought it might prove
to be an improvement on relations IF it was upheld.

Of course, it has proved to be merely lies, not just the
original agreement OFFERED by Mhaldor, but also the
subsequent peace agreement with the same basic terms
later agreed to.

We don't persecute the followers of Lord Sartan. Most
of us would just as soon never have anything to do with
those people, and tend to go out of our way to avoid
them on a daily basis. Certainly, many of us have
some dislike, but I would hardly call distaste and
staying out of Mhaldor persecution.

Repeated herb bans? Hmm...there have been 2 formal
Sentinel herb bans on Mhaldor..the first was rather short, and
started during that last time of conflict, and ended shortly
after it ended. The second started recently when you
decided to abrogate agreements your city made. As to its
ineffectiveness...it actually is totally effective.
The idea is not to stop you from having cures you need
should you ever be in combat. The principle is that WE
will not be the ones supplying you.

Attempts to govern the use of Necromancy? See the first part..
Mhaldor proposed it, not Oakstone. Of course, I personally
did not expect Mhaldor to be able to keep its word
regarding such a matter. And you have proven me right.

In response to your next post:

Rhakshai is not a man of reasonable intelligence. Just ask her.

The reason I procured the vardrax and the orders I gave
are not as you proclaimed. Indeed, the only actual order
given regarding placement of any vardrax traps was to place
them WITHIN forest, not highways. Of course, these traps
would be used against forest enemies, which means they
would not be doing any harm to the rational necromancers
out there.

The followers of Lord Sartan waged a war upon the forests.
The Red Fog destroyed many groves, and attempted to
spread throughout Sapience.
Mhaldor has twice broken its word regarding policies
on the use of Extermination, an idea first proposed
BY Mhaldor.

Which part of the reasoning behind my dislike do you find
irrational? I would not call it hatred..you cannot
hate a rabid dog, you just put it out of its misery
if you cannot stay away from it.

Or it away from you.

Covenant Stormcrow

Penned by my hand on the 4th of Glacian, in the year 350 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next