Achaean News
Choices
Written by: Sylvan General, Jack Moonflair, Ent of the Storm
Date: Tuesday, November 4th, 2003
Addressed to: Lord Kaelin Aristata
"Lord" Kaelin,
You suggest that forestials created the situation. Unless you mean by
punishing people who steal from us, and keeping murderers away from our
fellows less able to protect themselves, then of course you would see
how the situation was created by yours and not ours.
While you can claim that the forestials 'created' the situation,
everyone in sapience that you tried to speak to knows that the thieves
and highway men from your city died because of what they do. Tybalt got
enemied because he exterminated. According to the agreement made by your
city, he should thus be enemied there as well for breaking the agreement
that was made.
However it appears that instead, you wish to take the world of a
citymate, which can be understandable in some cities, and believe that
you and yours have been wronged without reason. Your post is interesting
in that it makes no point to support your reason for withdrawing on the
honour of the word given by those who came before you. You are about to
start a fight that can not be won by you and yours.
Damage can be done, you may win a battle or two. But this is a war that
you can not win. Your city didn't win it last time, and it won't this
time. I urge you to reconsider. We aren't confused about who created the
situation. The only thing even remotely confusing is why you would take
up your sword in this way, and throw down your city's word. You have
nothing to gain at all in this. Nothing will be gained. You have alot to
lose.
Please reconsider the possible outcomes of the two paths before you.
-Storm Ent of Northreach
Penned by my hand on the 18th of Lupar, in the year 348 AF.
Choices
Written by: Sylvan General, Jack Moonflair, Ent of the Storm
Date: Tuesday, November 4th, 2003
Addressed to: Lord Kaelin Aristata
"Lord" Kaelin,
You suggest that forestials created the situation. Unless you mean by
punishing people who steal from us, and keeping murderers away from our
fellows less able to protect themselves, then of course you would see
how the situation was created by yours and not ours.
While you can claim that the forestials 'created' the situation,
everyone in sapience that you tried to speak to knows that the thieves
and highway men from your city died because of what they do. Tybalt got
enemied because he exterminated. According to the agreement made by your
city, he should thus be enemied there as well for breaking the agreement
that was made.
However it appears that instead, you wish to take the world of a
citymate, which can be understandable in some cities, and believe that
you and yours have been wronged without reason. Your post is interesting
in that it makes no point to support your reason for withdrawing on the
honour of the word given by those who came before you. You are about to
start a fight that can not be won by you and yours.
Damage can be done, you may win a battle or two. But this is a war that
you can not win. Your city didn't win it last time, and it won't this
time. I urge you to reconsider. We aren't confused about who created the
situation. The only thing even remotely confusing is why you would take
up your sword in this way, and throw down your city's word. You have
nothing to gain at all in this. Nothing will be gained. You have alot to
lose.
Please reconsider the possible outcomes of the two paths before you.
-Storm Ent of Northreach
Penned by my hand on the 18th of Lupar, in the year 348 AF.
