Achaean News
Proficy and Pk rules vs Theft.
Written by: Kuniko
Date: Monday, September 8th, 2003
Addressed to: Everyone
I recently talked with a Divinity about the recent string of attacks on
Druids by Proficy.
It seems to me that Proficy likes to steal from people and then when the
victims attack him, he claims PK on them.
Here is a basic explanation of the rules:
Everyone normally is protected in two ways - If attacked, you can file
an issue, and let a Divinity/Admin deal out punishment as they see fit,
or, you gain the right to kill your attacker twice as 'revenge.'.
A thief forfits both of these rights if he steals from another, but
-only- to the target of the theft. This is so because it grants the
target of the theft the right to attack him without fear of creating
revenge.
For all -others- we tend to call it 'Open PK' on the attacks. All this
really means is that the thief can not issue anyone on assaults that
come after theft. All this means is that he gives up his first right
over PK.
Also, we know that Proficy likes to stack up PK's on people, as he's
done that for many a Druid recently, claiming absurd amounts of deaths
just for one death of his.
This is also somewhat true. There is another rule regarding this, as
well.
Time plays a key role while determining PK rights against agressive
abilities such as Hoist/Summon/Brazier Tattoos etc.
If you summon/hoist/try to detain a person and that person escapes, and
you continue to try to summon, but don't break the summoning attempts,
but do not break for more than 1 minute, this is one situation, not many
different attempts, warrenting one single PK for the target of the
summoning.
If you break the attempts for more than a minute, it turns into a
different situation, resulting in additional PK's for that oppressor.
These are the rules that the Divinity gave me. This does result in
Proficy losing many PK attempts to others, and also results in many
losing them towards him, but know we know the rules a little more
clearly. Thank you for your time.
Penned by my hand on the 11th of Daedalan, in the year 344 AF.
Proficy and Pk rules vs Theft.
Written by: Kuniko
Date: Monday, September 8th, 2003
Addressed to: Everyone
I recently talked with a Divinity about the recent string of attacks on
Druids by Proficy.
It seems to me that Proficy likes to steal from people and then when the
victims attack him, he claims PK on them.
Here is a basic explanation of the rules:
Everyone normally is protected in two ways - If attacked, you can file
an issue, and let a Divinity/Admin deal out punishment as they see fit,
or, you gain the right to kill your attacker twice as 'revenge.'.
A thief forfits both of these rights if he steals from another, but
-only- to the target of the theft. This is so because it grants the
target of the theft the right to attack him without fear of creating
revenge.
For all -others- we tend to call it 'Open PK' on the attacks. All this
really means is that the thief can not issue anyone on assaults that
come after theft. All this means is that he gives up his first right
over PK.
Also, we know that Proficy likes to stack up PK's on people, as he's
done that for many a Druid recently, claiming absurd amounts of deaths
just for one death of his.
This is also somewhat true. There is another rule regarding this, as
well.
Time plays a key role while determining PK rights against agressive
abilities such as Hoist/Summon/Brazier Tattoos etc.
If you summon/hoist/try to detain a person and that person escapes, and
you continue to try to summon, but don't break the summoning attempts,
but do not break for more than 1 minute, this is one situation, not many
different attempts, warrenting one single PK for the target of the
summoning.
If you break the attempts for more than a minute, it turns into a
different situation, resulting in additional PK's for that oppressor.
These are the rules that the Divinity gave me. This does result in
Proficy losing many PK attempts to others, and also results in many
losing them towards him, but know we know the rules a little more
clearly. Thank you for your time.
Penned by my hand on the 11th of Daedalan, in the year 344 AF.
