Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #11059

Your opinions

Written by: Covenant Stormcrow
Date: Friday, May 9th, 2003
Addressed to: Bishop of Hedonism, The Rev. Lodi Vespic de'Ta'sa Juvenis Primer


You state a few interesting things. It sounds like
your personal opinions have been based on certain
misinformations spread amongst your own side.

The extermination that was committed in Landmarking
was not done because of Landmarking. The Garden
is, after all, a Garden. Oakstone defenses do not
work there, nor can someone be grove summoned out
of it. It was done merely for spite and out of boredom.

Oakstone actually claims very clearly that no one owns any
forested location, not even Oakstone.

Dalamar's actions are actually not the reason Mhaldor
is in this situation. Mhaldor's actions are. You will note
Yig's last public post, and obviously note that Dalamar
was rewarded by being aided to a city office. Obviously,
a time honored law indeed.

As to your diatribe about what rights I have, you should
perhaps read Help Sentinels, you can answer your
own question as to where that right comes from.

To your suggestion that people should go ahead and sell
because there is much money to be made, and its
only a few minor laws...Interesting. If it was you
being forestenemied for it, I doubt you would consider it
minor. And if an appeal to people's greediness
is the best you can do, then you don't appear
to understand basic supply and demand, because there
are plenty of customers who are not members of
Mhaldor.

Covenant Stormcrow

Penned by my hand on the 14th of Ero, in the year 334 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #11059

Your opinions

Written by: Covenant Stormcrow
Date: Friday, May 9th, 2003
Addressed to: Bishop of Hedonism, The Rev. Lodi Vespic de'Ta'sa Juvenis Primer


You state a few interesting things. It sounds like
your personal opinions have been based on certain
misinformations spread amongst your own side.

The extermination that was committed in Landmarking
was not done because of Landmarking. The Garden
is, after all, a Garden. Oakstone defenses do not
work there, nor can someone be grove summoned out
of it. It was done merely for spite and out of boredom.

Oakstone actually claims very clearly that no one owns any
forested location, not even Oakstone.

Dalamar's actions are actually not the reason Mhaldor
is in this situation. Mhaldor's actions are. You will note
Yig's last public post, and obviously note that Dalamar
was rewarded by being aided to a city office. Obviously,
a time honored law indeed.

As to your diatribe about what rights I have, you should
perhaps read Help Sentinels, you can answer your
own question as to where that right comes from.

To your suggestion that people should go ahead and sell
because there is much money to be made, and its
only a few minor laws...Interesting. If it was you
being forestenemied for it, I doubt you would consider it
minor. And if an appeal to people's greediness
is the best you can do, then you don't appear
to understand basic supply and demand, because there
are plenty of customers who are not members of
Mhaldor.

Covenant Stormcrow

Penned by my hand on the 14th of Ero, in the year 334 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next