Ok...Brinn, please do share if not empirical evidence then at least
philosophical reasoning behind your belief that *Chaos is a desease that
destroys*. Do take into account that separate examples of activities of
those professing adherence to Chaos is not good enough, unless you want
me to judge the Church by the likes of Dresden as well. Furthermore, the
adherence to Chaotic philosophy is very wide - some indulge in the
physical aspect of it (experimentation and such) whereas some other
(like myself) adhere to it for the personal existential implications
that Chaotic philosophy carries. Please provide the empirical evidence
that the Chaotic Principle (however you define it) which applies to ALL
followers and brands them as *Chaoites* is a "desease that destroys*.
I warn again, pointing at a few people is NOT proof that the principle
itself is a menace. I personal find that 95% of those following the
Church are nothing more than crusading slaves, incapable of creating and
supporting their own ethical structure, and hence outsource their
morality to an institution, but this does not stop me from appreciating
(to what degree i can) the IDEAL of Philosophy of Light. So I urge to
address the metaphysical aspect of Chaos in presenting your empirical
evidence.
And btw, this is NOT a rhetorical inquiry - I do hope you answer.

Penned by my hand on the 14th of Ero, in the year 328 AF.