This is not exactly my place to post on this, since I am neither a citizen of Ashtan, Shallam, Hashan, nor a member of the church.
However, since I did open my big mouth on the subject of honour, I feel it is my responsibility to post once more on the subject.
>I still feel that Pierce convocating Tylin was not dishonourable, he was in a state of war. However, the treaty (Public post 3264) specifically states: 4. There shall be no convocations without agreement of the subject of the convocation.
The Church and Shallam agreed to this treaty, and it did not state "unless an individual declares war on you". It said no convocations. Period. Unless agreed to.
Pierce should be enemied by all three city-states.
>I am sorry.

Galdrion Longshanks
The Wolf who admits when he's wrong. *grin

Penned by my hand on the 1st of Lupar, in the year 236 AF.