Your recent behavior is probably even more pathetic than the first post I ever read from you "I have interviewed different Occultists and confirmed church dogma: they're all evil bastards after all" Not only have you TOTALLY blown my post out of proportion, but now you have the audacity to openly state that you are a scholar and then with the same breath you mock the fact that Occultists claim to be indifiduals when attacked with generalizations and stereotypes.
A scholar indeed: From one scholar to another, I present you with this question: do you even know what the HELL an Occultist is?! You seem hell-bent on classifying all Occultists as ruthless, bloodthirsty necromancers that eat hearts, sacrifice babies, and engage in blood orgies with the hopes that one day we will be covered with the blood of Sapience, dancing around saying "good Eris it's fun being evil!"
I suggest you visit the Shallamese library and find whatever knowledge you can about Occultism, even using dictionaries if you have to (unless, of course, you burned those blasphemous tomes of knowledge, too). Perhaps after your research you'll understand that Occultists study and devote their lives to CHAOS, not Necromancy.
I possess the knowledge to bring such pain and torment upon a man with my powers of Necromancy such that no past scourge would ever be my equal. However, even you, Israfel, have the potential to use shrines to destroy anybody painfully and efficiently at your leisure. My point? Just because I possess this knowledge doesn't mean I do this regularly unless provoked, as I'm sure your intent isn't to use shrines to slay every innocent soul in the realm of Sapience. Are you saying that it is impossible for an Occultist to not be as malevolent as the next one? May I remind you that Occultism was founded by those that worshipped the powers of Chaos, and not necessarilly the powers of death?
To me and my pursuit for Chaos I have come to realize that Light, Darkness, Evil, Good, Life, and Death are all irrelevant to my goal. While I realize you find it convenient to try and label every Occultist as being some snarling beast from your nightmares, I will inform you, from one scholar to another, that you are mistaken.
With these words I kindly implore you to keep in mind that my recent posts haven't been created to try and mock your intelligence or to try and belittle you. My ultimate goal, from my very first post, was simply to correct your misinformed statements about Occultism. All you would've had to do was NOTHING: I don't want any apologies. I just want you to silence yourself and keep your scholarly mouth shut. I realize you don't have the mental capacity to take this advice, and I realize you will post, yet again, saying that I'm evil, you're good, and I'm wrong simply because you said so.
However, let it be known to all that I do not like bickering, especially with someone as unmoving as yourself. However, I will speak my mind to you as long as you continue to write posts with my name in them.


Kruldar Gront


P.S. Someone related the fall of the Seleucarian empire to the Occultists' coexistence with the rest of the empire's sects. Let me assure you, that this is not why the empire fell. One must realize that all civilizations, orders, and societies, no matter how mighty, will fall eventually.
The reasons can be numerous: It's not fair to assume that the most suspicious are always the guilty ones.

Penned by my hand on the 25th of Phaestian, in the year 253 AF.