Achaean News
A few counter points to make.
Written by: Elusive Dream
Date: Wednesday, April 5th, 2000
Addressed to: Crusader Molotov, Buddy of Light
You made mincemeat of my analogies Molotov, but you never seemed
to develop any arguement against my point. However I can now see
that all the words have confused many as to what my point was.
Therefore I shall try and state it more plainly.
My point invloved the incident with Borknagar.
I said the worst thing he did was anger the gods.
Molotov disaggreed saying that the worst thing he did was betray
friends.
So boiling down my last note it comes to this. If I am correct
and Borknagar wished to work against Shallam from the beginning,
then none of you were TRULY his friends. Therefore he could not
betray his friends by betraying you. To be upset with Borknagar
who seems to have been a deceitful man (in his heart) for being
deceitful is pointless.
And yes Molotov hearts and natures may change, but it doesn't
matter if natures change, because at the time of the incident and
with all probability long before the incident, Borknagar had a
deceitful nature. And he was meerly carrying out that nature.
Is this more clear? Or does anyone need me to simplify further?
-Dream
Penned by my hand on the 21st of Sarapin, in the year 245 AF.
A few counter points to make.
Written by: Elusive Dream
Date: Wednesday, April 5th, 2000
Addressed to: Crusader Molotov, Buddy of Light
You made mincemeat of my analogies Molotov, but you never seemed
to develop any arguement against my point. However I can now see
that all the words have confused many as to what my point was.
Therefore I shall try and state it more plainly.
My point invloved the incident with Borknagar.
I said the worst thing he did was anger the gods.
Molotov disaggreed saying that the worst thing he did was betray
friends.
So boiling down my last note it comes to this. If I am correct
and Borknagar wished to work against Shallam from the beginning,
then none of you were TRULY his friends. Therefore he could not
betray his friends by betraying you. To be upset with Borknagar
who seems to have been a deceitful man (in his heart) for being
deceitful is pointless.
And yes Molotov hearts and natures may change, but it doesn't
matter if natures change, because at the time of the incident and
with all probability long before the incident, Borknagar had a
deceitful nature. And he was meerly carrying out that nature.
Is this more clear? Or does anyone need me to simplify further?
-Dream
Penned by my hand on the 21st of Sarapin, in the year 245 AF.