My slander of you is based on the fact that you freely admit to being
a murderer. Gawain informed me that you, for some odd reason, consider
yourself a pacifist, based on some line of reasoning that goes "I only
kill certain sentient beings, therefore I'm a pacifist."

As for my vow, I will gladly take it, should Sarapis consent. Further,
since he would presumably be the judge of what constitutes innocence,
the only way those definitions could change would be if he changed them,
meaning that, by definition, the definition of innocence has changed.

As for you, Servelan, I'm curious if any of the Moghedu have actually told
you that they like being slaughtered. And is there not a Mhun cook in there
which you have killed? Hmmm? I am fairly sure the cook doesn't enjoy
being kicked around. And what about the villagers of Tomacula? Don't see
any war-like inscriptions on their walls. In any case, war-like inscriptions
prove nothing except that someone (possibly not even the Mhun) at one time
drew depictions of battle on the walls. In any case, your logic is again
very very poor, for the same reasons as Changcoix's. Just because some
artist Mhun decided to draw war-like pictures doesn't mean that the rest
of the Mhun want to die.
Since I am so magnamonious, I will forgive you if you manage to find the
artist who drew those paintings, and slay him. Until you gain the explicit
consent of the actual Mhun being slain though, I think it is pretty safe
to assume that they'd prefer not to be slain over and over and over.

As for "interfering" I haven't noticed that I have interfered in any way
with your killing of the Mhun.

At the end of the day, I am finished with this useless bantering. The tongues
of evil-doers are slippery and full of hypocrisy. It's funny that you think
it's ok to slay hundreds of Mhun and object when I slay one human. Either
you are an idiot to not see this hypocrisy or you are a racist.
Penned by my hand on the 21st of Phaestian, in the year 179 AF.