Hail High Lady Istiria,

I make no claim to great intelligence, thus the fault in understanding
could be mine, but do help me clear up some confusion that has clouded
my mind.

This slew of posts from the two Knight houses of East and West was
started by Sir Batista's post, where he lists such Shallamese knights as
Sir Antonius, Sir Silas and Sir Alban as demonstrating all the qualities
that should be present in a true knight.

Yet here we are, at your post, where you list Sir Alban as an example
precisely of what a true knight is not.

Is Sir Batista not a member of the Maldaathi? Do you two not share core
values?

Perhaps it is the Maldaathi who do not understand what honour is, if two
of their Knights have such differing viewpoints...

Latus Sioraiocht

Penned by my hand on the 20th of Aeguary, in the year 450 AF.