Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #167

replies

Written by: Aeschylus, the Unmoved
Date: Sunday, December 14th, 1997
Addressed to: Everybody


Changcoix, your post was so full of contradictory statements that it makes
me wonder if you are even capable of formulating a coherent, logical thought.
Let's examine exactly what you said, shall we?

You seem to justify the killing of Mhun by saying that Kothlun (a Mhun) has
done something to you. Now, nevermind that in my post I specifically said
that the Mhun who reside in Moghedu (ie not Kothlun) never leave it, so have
done nothing to you. However, you seem to want to argue that guilt by racial
association is a legitimate reason to kill. Fine. In that case, you obviously
can have no problem with me killing, say, any humans that are about (like
Krissandra) as Damascas, a human, has wronged me. In fact, if you think it's
ok to consider someone guilty by virtue of the race they were born into, then
SURELY you don't have a problem with someone slaughtering your small guildmembers, for they had a choice about their association with the Kharon.
This is such a stupid line of argument though, that I'm not even going to carry on.
As for why I attack Servelan, that is my business, not yours. I'm sure Servelan
can defend herself against my attacks, seeing as how she is ranked in the top
3 and I'm not even in the top 10.

As for the Mhun: I have spoken to Sarapis about this, and he assures me
that the Mhun definitely do not enjoy being slaughtered repeatedly and
that it is not consensual battle, as Servelan tries to claim. Your whole-sale
slaughter of innocents is a damn good reason for the Church and all those
who would defend the innocent to slay you. If I have to add some corrupt
Druids to my list of enemies, so be it. I'd rather not, but it seems that
Buckthorn at least (the guild Secretary) has fallen in with Servelan and
her lackeys.

Ahh, I have an idea as far as these accusations of slaughtering innocents go.
I admit that I slew Krissandra without provocation (well, by Changcoix's logic,
I had excellent reason, seeing as how she was guilty by association with the Kharon). I apologize from my deepest soul for this,
and I am willing to swear before Sarapis himself that I will never again
intentionally slay an innocent. Are the rest of you, who try to claim that
you are not murdering scum, willing to do the same? Are you willing to
actually risk something when there is an independent judge involved? I doubt it
frankly.

Laergon: I challenged you to Psychic Combat because I was told by Daedalus
that the loser of a psychic combat loses the use of his telepathy for a
period of time, measured in hours. I'm perfectly happy to face you in
single combat outside of Psychic Combat. We shall see if you are so willing
when you next see me.

The Just shall prevail.
Penned by my hand on the 14th of Phaestian, in the year 179 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #167

replies

Written by: Aeschylus, the Unmoved
Date: Sunday, December 14th, 1997
Addressed to: Everybody


Changcoix, your post was so full of contradictory statements that it makes
me wonder if you are even capable of formulating a coherent, logical thought.
Let's examine exactly what you said, shall we?

You seem to justify the killing of Mhun by saying that Kothlun (a Mhun) has
done something to you. Now, nevermind that in my post I specifically said
that the Mhun who reside in Moghedu (ie not Kothlun) never leave it, so have
done nothing to you. However, you seem to want to argue that guilt by racial
association is a legitimate reason to kill. Fine. In that case, you obviously
can have no problem with me killing, say, any humans that are about (like
Krissandra) as Damascas, a human, has wronged me. In fact, if you think it's
ok to consider someone guilty by virtue of the race they were born into, then
SURELY you don't have a problem with someone slaughtering your small guildmembers, for they had a choice about their association with the Kharon.
This is such a stupid line of argument though, that I'm not even going to carry on.
As for why I attack Servelan, that is my business, not yours. I'm sure Servelan
can defend herself against my attacks, seeing as how she is ranked in the top
3 and I'm not even in the top 10.

As for the Mhun: I have spoken to Sarapis about this, and he assures me
that the Mhun definitely do not enjoy being slaughtered repeatedly and
that it is not consensual battle, as Servelan tries to claim. Your whole-sale
slaughter of innocents is a damn good reason for the Church and all those
who would defend the innocent to slay you. If I have to add some corrupt
Druids to my list of enemies, so be it. I'd rather not, but it seems that
Buckthorn at least (the guild Secretary) has fallen in with Servelan and
her lackeys.

Ahh, I have an idea as far as these accusations of slaughtering innocents go.
I admit that I slew Krissandra without provocation (well, by Changcoix's logic,
I had excellent reason, seeing as how she was guilty by association with the Kharon). I apologize from my deepest soul for this,
and I am willing to swear before Sarapis himself that I will never again
intentionally slay an innocent. Are the rest of you, who try to claim that
you are not murdering scum, willing to do the same? Are you willing to
actually risk something when there is an independent judge involved? I doubt it
frankly.

Laergon: I challenged you to Psychic Combat because I was told by Daedalus
that the loser of a psychic combat loses the use of his telepathy for a
period of time, measured in hours. I'm perfectly happy to face you in
single combat outside of Psychic Combat. We shall see if you are so willing
when you next see me.

The Just shall prevail.
Penned by my hand on the 14th of Phaestian, in the year 179 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next