I merely displayed your arguement against mine that you say makes mine
illogical. I presented the fact that no matter whether you believe a
Forest or a Person is Nature or not, does not change the fact that it
is. Just like the fact that if you don't believe Mhaldor exists, it will
not stop existing. And you returned with Truth is changed by the
Majority which as you can see is quite incorrect. If you do not agree
with your arguements why use them? Perhaps you would care to rephrase
your statement? Because as it is very clearly quoted leaving nothing out
except my words which I put in this post. You can see I used your exact
words, and they still follow no logic even twisted round about logic.

Respectfully,
Jago Verasall

Penned by my hand on the 5th of Ero, in the year 393 AF.