Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #14713

Preceding posts...Hmmmm

Written by: Quaero Vetustas Alaiea, The Fiend
Date: Monday, May 16th, 2005
Addressed to: Everyone


Brevity is the wit of the soul, they say...I shall keep that in mind.
- Comparing the holocausts to regular forestal harvesting: Do I even
have to say it? Just imagine what would happen if everyone made your
line of thinking their maxim and all plants got burned instead of
harvested. Would that affect you, and if so, in a positive or in a
negative way? Hmmm? When making clever arguments like this, do keep in
mind that they must be applicable by everyone to make any sense.
Oakstone and profits: I for my part am leaving Oakstone out of this
discussion, but- Suggested minimum priced are called "Oakstone
minimums", but there is no share of them that actually goes to Oakstone.
Oakstone has no profit interest in any of this.

More to the point: Are the forestals doing what's right for Nature and
the forests, and are their ideals justified? That's not for us to
decide, certainly even less for you to decide, and not the issue here.
You don't hear me enriching the world with my opinion on the Seven
Truths.
What it all boils down to is- if you have beef with forestals, take it
up with them and not Nature. If you're just doing this to entertain
yourself, grow up.

Penned by my hand on the 11th of Phaestian, in the year 392 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #14713

Preceding posts...Hmmmm

Written by: Quaero Vetustas Alaiea, The Fiend
Date: Monday, May 16th, 2005
Addressed to: Everyone


Brevity is the wit of the soul, they say...I shall keep that in mind.
- Comparing the holocausts to regular forestal harvesting: Do I even
have to say it? Just imagine what would happen if everyone made your
line of thinking their maxim and all plants got burned instead of
harvested. Would that affect you, and if so, in a positive or in a
negative way? Hmmm? When making clever arguments like this, do keep in
mind that they must be applicable by everyone to make any sense.
Oakstone and profits: I for my part am leaving Oakstone out of this
discussion, but- Suggested minimum priced are called "Oakstone
minimums", but there is no share of them that actually goes to Oakstone.
Oakstone has no profit interest in any of this.

More to the point: Are the forestals doing what's right for Nature and
the forests, and are their ideals justified? That's not for us to
decide, certainly even less for you to decide, and not the issue here.
You don't hear me enriching the world with my opinion on the Seven
Truths.
What it all boils down to is- if you have beef with forestals, take it
up with them and not Nature. If you're just doing this to entertain
yourself, grow up.

Penned by my hand on the 11th of Phaestian, in the year 392 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next