Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #13764

Your post, and other random babbling

Written by: Maha-not-quite-raja Relos, Not Very Punny Mhun-key
Date: Monday, December 27th, 2004
Addressed to: Highlord Caine, the Pharaoh of Blades


First, lemme just say, public posts don't waste the public's time. Why?
Because hardly anyone reads them anyway.

Second, perhaps you forget what your post was? You first took the side
of Khoraji, your Tyrannus, in an argument that didn't even concern you.
Then, you commented that Aladraion should leave the talking to whomever
-he- was serving. Machiavelli simply pointed out the inconsistency in
such a post. My following post was simply to comment how you never
addressed that issue. The fact you managed to completely -miss- that
issue, despite Machi pointing it out, says it all really.

To me, having someone point out such a glaring inconsistency in your
post, one that really is kind of hard to rationalize (I mean, it's okay
for -you- to stand up and defend those in authority over you, but not
okay for Aladraion to?), is soundly thrashing your whole set of
arguments, such as they are. You're welcome to feel otherwise.

Lastly, lemme just ask, have you ever noticed how the intelligent people
are only those who see what you see? Even if on the other side of the
proverbial fence? If they see something you miss, or just don't
understand, suddenly, they stop being intelligent?

Penned by my hand on the 21st of Ero, in the year 381 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #13764

Your post, and other random babbling

Written by: Maha-not-quite-raja Relos, Not Very Punny Mhun-key
Date: Monday, December 27th, 2004
Addressed to: Highlord Caine, the Pharaoh of Blades


First, lemme just say, public posts don't waste the public's time. Why?
Because hardly anyone reads them anyway.

Second, perhaps you forget what your post was? You first took the side
of Khoraji, your Tyrannus, in an argument that didn't even concern you.
Then, you commented that Aladraion should leave the talking to whomever
-he- was serving. Machiavelli simply pointed out the inconsistency in
such a post. My following post was simply to comment how you never
addressed that issue. The fact you managed to completely -miss- that
issue, despite Machi pointing it out, says it all really.

To me, having someone point out such a glaring inconsistency in your
post, one that really is kind of hard to rationalize (I mean, it's okay
for -you- to stand up and defend those in authority over you, but not
okay for Aladraion to?), is soundly thrashing your whole set of
arguments, such as they are. You're welcome to feel otherwise.

Lastly, lemme just ask, have you ever noticed how the intelligent people
are only those who see what you see? Even if on the other side of the
proverbial fence? If they see something you miss, or just don't
understand, suddenly, they stop being intelligent?

Penned by my hand on the 21st of Ero, in the year 381 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next