Elsp, my dear. I don't know why you insisted on telling me this over a
public format. I agree with you. I will never consider someone who harms
nature a forestal.
Thanks for trying to 'teach' me, but I already understand this point and
scenario very well. When I was referring to how all forestals don't
always have the same beliefs or whatnot, I was not referring to people
who aide exterminations, or overharvest. That is irrelevant to my point
made.
I was commenting on a message sent to me by Qwilleran. Him, stating that
all rogues are not considered "forestals". Being rogue does not mean
that I disagree with everything a guilded Druid believes, or Oakstone
members, etc.
Rogue's should be considered forestals, until they have proven
otherwise. I'm very sick of people judging people based on what
affiliations they might have. I do not have to be apart of Oakstone,
Eleusis, Druids guild; to be a good "forestal".

Perhaps, if you sit down and talked to some of us 'rogues', you'd
understand that we aren't all that different from you.

Things will not get better, until the whole forestal community is
working together. Right now, all I see is a bunch of fighting amongst
ourselves.
Making judgements out of ignorance, making assumptions without knowing
the Truth, bickering about what is right or wrong on nature's behalf...
This all needs to stop. It is tiring, and quite distracting for everyone
involved. Let's all work together.

Just some more thoughts of mine,
Ariella

Penned by my hand on the 24th of Phaestian, in the year 352 AF.