Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #10689

Chaos

Written by: Sir Brinn
Date: Thursday, February 27th, 2003
Addressed to: Eris, Goddess of Chaos


A list of harmful actions You or Your realm has committed since Your
ascension. (Note that this leaves out the kid slaughtering, and lying to
Sarapis that Your mortal shell had conducted):

Remember Your red squirrel wrecking havoc on Oneiros's peaceful temple?
(read around public 1748)

Something Wicked This Way Comes (public 642, public 616):
The itsy bitsy spawny
Crawled up the spout AGAIN!
And again, and again. Wicked, in Your own words.

You still haven't provided proof that Chaos substance doesn't actually
destroy the fabric of Creation.

You mislead those that aspire to Chaos. Remember, if some other intrepid
soul dares to repeat Servelan's experiment, expect something quite
different than the result Servelan received. (public 569). As Your
mortal being experienced:
You see the Idol of Madness swell to an enormous mass of everchanging
size, shape and colour. Your body begins to lose all cohesion and begins
to change, growing extra limbs, eyes, and mouths and just as quickly
re-absorbing them. In a final burst of unbelievable, inhuman pain, your
mind snaps and you become irreparably insane.

Another misinformation, that I can prove is that Your drunken escapades
did not grant the treekin sentience. No God aside Sarapis is able to
grant sentience to any object. Even Phaestus had to gain Sarapis's
blessings for his Dwarven creations. Lady Demeter has confirmed that
Sarapis had blessed Her roses, which caused sentience in Your hostile,
reticent tree-mutations. So plainly, You did not create the treekin. You
only created hostility and reticence.

Of course, all statements about Chaos, including Yours, are true in some
sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in
some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in
some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense.

So really, whatever You say must obviously be correct. Or wrong. Make up
Your mind, if You really want a ordered, logical, sensible discussion.

-Sir Brinn

Penned by my hand on the 22nd of Chronos, in the year 328 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #10689

Chaos

Written by: Sir Brinn
Date: Thursday, February 27th, 2003
Addressed to: Eris, Goddess of Chaos


A list of harmful actions You or Your realm has committed since Your
ascension. (Note that this leaves out the kid slaughtering, and lying to
Sarapis that Your mortal shell had conducted):

Remember Your red squirrel wrecking havoc on Oneiros's peaceful temple?
(read around public 1748)

Something Wicked This Way Comes (public 642, public 616):
The itsy bitsy spawny
Crawled up the spout AGAIN!
And again, and again. Wicked, in Your own words.

You still haven't provided proof that Chaos substance doesn't actually
destroy the fabric of Creation.

You mislead those that aspire to Chaos. Remember, if some other intrepid
soul dares to repeat Servelan's experiment, expect something quite
different than the result Servelan received. (public 569). As Your
mortal being experienced:
You see the Idol of Madness swell to an enormous mass of everchanging
size, shape and colour. Your body begins to lose all cohesion and begins
to change, growing extra limbs, eyes, and mouths and just as quickly
re-absorbing them. In a final burst of unbelievable, inhuman pain, your
mind snaps and you become irreparably insane.

Another misinformation, that I can prove is that Your drunken escapades
did not grant the treekin sentience. No God aside Sarapis is able to
grant sentience to any object. Even Phaestus had to gain Sarapis's
blessings for his Dwarven creations. Lady Demeter has confirmed that
Sarapis had blessed Her roses, which caused sentience in Your hostile,
reticent tree-mutations. So plainly, You did not create the treekin. You
only created hostility and reticence.

Of course, all statements about Chaos, including Yours, are true in some
sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in
some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in
some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense.

So really, whatever You say must obviously be correct. Or wrong. Make up
Your mind, if You really want a ordered, logical, sensible discussion.

-Sir Brinn

Penned by my hand on the 22nd of Chronos, in the year 328 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next