As i see it, so-called "evil" people spend their time in pursuit of
greatness, through inflictiing pain on others and through the following
of lord sartan, which to many of you seems perhaps barbaric, but i
nothing more than their way of life, and beliefs.

So-caled "good" or "righteous" people aim for harmony and peace, yet
they pilliage guilds and raid cities, just for believeing differently to
their own beliefs. Surely these acts are just as evil as what they are
trying to opress?

Evil uses deciet and harm to gain their goals, Good does the same. is
there really much difference between the two?

To me, as a neutral, it seems that being neutral, is more "Good" than
those who claim to be good now, but still no more evil, than "evil".

So it seems that neutrality is the best form of good, if you define good
as humility, peace, and respect, and that the "good" of this world need
to think about whether they act how they tell others to act, and evil,
though frowned upon by many, still only does what they have always done,
be it wrong in your eyes or not.

With the current times, is good not more evil, than evil?

Ashaar Longshanks-Askari - Neutral Jester

Penned by my hand on the 11th of Glacian, in the year 324 AF.